I think it's a little simplistic to explain a work through the psychology of its author. In other words, that Haneke has emotional problems, so I don't have to take his films seriously. By using this argument, the viewer retreats from the challenges of the film.
I live in a world where there's magazines and blogs, and people feel like they are allowed to criticize me, and in the meanest way.
We feel good about our running backs as we have them right now, and we will continue to see how they progress.